b24e7fce |
1 | |
2 | Frequently Asked Questions about zlib |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | If your question is not there, please check the zlib home page |
6 | http://zlib.net/ which may have more recent information. |
7 | The lastest zlib FAQ is at http://zlib.net/zlib_faq.html |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | 1. Is zlib Y2K-compliant? |
11 | |
12 | Yes. zlib doesn't handle dates. |
13 | |
14 | 2. Where can I get a Windows DLL version? |
15 | |
16 | The zlib sources can be compiled without change to produce a DLL. See the |
17 | file win32/DLL_FAQ.txt in the zlib distribution. Pointers to the |
18 | precompiled DLL are found in the zlib web site at http://zlib.net/ . |
19 | |
20 | 3. Where can I get a Visual Basic interface to zlib? |
21 | |
22 | See |
23 | * http://marknelson.us/1997/01/01/zlib-engine/ |
24 | * win32/DLL_FAQ.txt in the zlib distribution |
25 | |
26 | 4. compress() returns Z_BUF_ERROR. |
27 | |
28 | Make sure that before the call of compress(), the length of the compressed |
29 | buffer is equal to the available size of the compressed buffer and not |
30 | zero. For Visual Basic, check that this parameter is passed by reference |
31 | ("as any"), not by value ("as long"). |
32 | |
33 | 5. deflate() or inflate() returns Z_BUF_ERROR. |
34 | |
35 | Before making the call, make sure that avail_in and avail_out are not zero. |
36 | When setting the parameter flush equal to Z_FINISH, also make sure that |
37 | avail_out is big enough to allow processing all pending input. Note that a |
38 | Z_BUF_ERROR is not fatal--another call to deflate() or inflate() can be |
39 | made with more input or output space. A Z_BUF_ERROR may in fact be |
40 | unavoidable depending on how the functions are used, since it is not |
41 | possible to tell whether or not there is more output pending when |
42 | strm.avail_out returns with zero. See http://zlib.net/zlib_how.html for a |
43 | heavily annotated example. |
44 | |
45 | 6. Where's the zlib documentation (man pages, etc.)? |
46 | |
47 | It's in zlib.h . Examples of zlib usage are in the files test/example.c |
48 | and test/minigzip.c, with more in examples/ . |
49 | |
50 | 7. Why don't you use GNU autoconf or libtool or ...? |
51 | |
52 | Because we would like to keep zlib as a very small and simple package. |
53 | zlib is rather portable and doesn't need much configuration. |
54 | |
55 | 8. I found a bug in zlib. |
56 | |
57 | Most of the time, such problems are due to an incorrect usage of zlib. |
58 | Please try to reproduce the problem with a small program and send the |
59 | corresponding source to us at zlib@gzip.org . Do not send multi-megabyte |
60 | data files without prior agreement. |
61 | |
62 | 9. Why do I get "undefined reference to gzputc"? |
63 | |
64 | If "make test" produces something like |
65 | |
66 | example.o(.text+0x154): undefined reference to `gzputc' |
67 | |
68 | check that you don't have old files libz.* in /usr/lib, /usr/local/lib or |
69 | /usr/X11R6/lib. Remove any old versions, then do "make install". |
70 | |
71 | 10. I need a Delphi interface to zlib. |
72 | |
73 | See the contrib/delphi directory in the zlib distribution. |
74 | |
75 | 11. Can zlib handle .zip archives? |
76 | |
77 | Not by itself, no. See the directory contrib/minizip in the zlib |
78 | distribution. |
79 | |
80 | 12. Can zlib handle .Z files? |
81 | |
82 | No, sorry. You have to spawn an uncompress or gunzip subprocess, or adapt |
83 | the code of uncompress on your own. |
84 | |
85 | 13. How can I make a Unix shared library? |
86 | |
87 | By default a shared (and a static) library is built for Unix. So: |
88 | |
89 | make distclean |
90 | ./configure |
91 | make |
92 | |
93 | 14. How do I install a shared zlib library on Unix? |
94 | |
95 | After the above, then: |
96 | |
97 | make install |
98 | |
99 | However, many flavors of Unix come with a shared zlib already installed. |
100 | Before going to the trouble of compiling a shared version of zlib and |
101 | trying to install it, you may want to check if it's already there! If you |
102 | can #include <zlib.h>, it's there. The -lz option will probably link to |
103 | it. You can check the version at the top of zlib.h or with the |
104 | ZLIB_VERSION symbol defined in zlib.h . |
105 | |
106 | 15. I have a question about OttoPDF. |
107 | |
108 | We are not the authors of OttoPDF. The real author is on the OttoPDF web |
109 | site: Joel Hainley, jhainley@myndkryme.com. |
110 | |
111 | 16. Can zlib decode Flate data in an Adobe PDF file? |
112 | |
113 | Yes. See http://www.pdflib.com/ . To modify PDF forms, see |
114 | http://sourceforge.net/projects/acroformtool/ . |
115 | |
116 | 17. Why am I getting this "register_frame_info not found" error on Solaris? |
117 | |
118 | After installing zlib 1.1.4 on Solaris 2.6, running applications using zlib |
119 | generates an error such as: |
120 | |
121 | ld.so.1: rpm: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/local/lib/libz.so: |
122 | symbol __register_frame_info: referenced symbol not found |
123 | |
124 | The symbol __register_frame_info is not part of zlib, it is generated by |
125 | the C compiler (cc or gcc). You must recompile applications using zlib |
126 | which have this problem. This problem is specific to Solaris. See |
127 | http://www.sunfreeware.com for Solaris versions of zlib and applications |
128 | using zlib. |
129 | |
130 | 18. Why does gzip give an error on a file I make with compress/deflate? |
131 | |
132 | The compress and deflate functions produce data in the zlib format, which |
133 | is different and incompatible with the gzip format. The gz* functions in |
134 | zlib on the other hand use the gzip format. Both the zlib and gzip formats |
135 | use the same compressed data format internally, but have different headers |
136 | and trailers around the compressed data. |
137 | |
138 | 19. Ok, so why are there two different formats? |
139 | |
140 | The gzip format was designed to retain the directory information about a |
141 | single file, such as the name and last modification date. The zlib format |
142 | on the other hand was designed for in-memory and communication channel |
143 | applications, and has a much more compact header and trailer and uses a |
144 | faster integrity check than gzip. |
145 | |
146 | 20. Well that's nice, but how do I make a gzip file in memory? |
147 | |
148 | You can request that deflate write the gzip format instead of the zlib |
149 | format using deflateInit2(). You can also request that inflate decode the |
150 | gzip format using inflateInit2(). Read zlib.h for more details. |
151 | |
152 | 21. Is zlib thread-safe? |
153 | |
154 | Yes. However any library routines that zlib uses and any application- |
155 | provided memory allocation routines must also be thread-safe. zlib's gz* |
156 | functions use stdio library routines, and most of zlib's functions use the |
157 | library memory allocation routines by default. zlib's *Init* functions |
158 | allow for the application to provide custom memory allocation routines. |
159 | |
160 | Of course, you should only operate on any given zlib or gzip stream from a |
161 | single thread at a time. |
162 | |
163 | 22. Can I use zlib in my commercial application? |
164 | |
165 | Yes. Please read the license in zlib.h. |
166 | |
167 | 23. Is zlib under the GNU license? |
168 | |
169 | No. Please read the license in zlib.h. |
170 | |
171 | 24. The license says that altered source versions must be "plainly marked". So |
172 | what exactly do I need to do to meet that requirement? |
173 | |
174 | You need to change the ZLIB_VERSION and ZLIB_VERNUM #defines in zlib.h. In |
175 | particular, the final version number needs to be changed to "f", and an |
176 | identification string should be appended to ZLIB_VERSION. Version numbers |
177 | x.x.x.f are reserved for modifications to zlib by others than the zlib |
178 | maintainers. For example, if the version of the base zlib you are altering |
179 | is "1.2.3.4", then in zlib.h you should change ZLIB_VERNUM to 0x123f, and |
180 | ZLIB_VERSION to something like "1.2.3.f-zachary-mods-v3". You can also |
181 | update the version strings in deflate.c and inftrees.c. |
182 | |
183 | For altered source distributions, you should also note the origin and |
184 | nature of the changes in zlib.h, as well as in ChangeLog and README, along |
185 | with the dates of the alterations. The origin should include at least your |
186 | name (or your company's name), and an email address to contact for help or |
187 | issues with the library. |
188 | |
189 | Note that distributing a compiled zlib library along with zlib.h and |
190 | zconf.h is also a source distribution, and so you should change |
191 | ZLIB_VERSION and ZLIB_VERNUM and note the origin and nature of the changes |
192 | in zlib.h as you would for a full source distribution. |
193 | |
194 | 25. Will zlib work on a big-endian or little-endian architecture, and can I |
195 | exchange compressed data between them? |
196 | |
197 | Yes and yes. |
198 | |
199 | 26. Will zlib work on a 64-bit machine? |
200 | |
201 | Yes. It has been tested on 64-bit machines, and has no dependence on any |
202 | data types being limited to 32-bits in length. If you have any |
203 | difficulties, please provide a complete problem report to zlib@gzip.org |
204 | |
205 | 27. Will zlib decompress data from the PKWare Data Compression Library? |
206 | |
207 | No. The PKWare DCL uses a completely different compressed data format than |
208 | does PKZIP and zlib. However, you can look in zlib's contrib/blast |
209 | directory for a possible solution to your problem. |
210 | |
211 | 28. Can I access data randomly in a compressed stream? |
212 | |
213 | No, not without some preparation. If when compressing you periodically use |
214 | Z_FULL_FLUSH, carefully write all the pending data at those points, and |
215 | keep an index of those locations, then you can start decompression at those |
216 | points. You have to be careful to not use Z_FULL_FLUSH too often, since it |
217 | can significantly degrade compression. Alternatively, you can scan a |
218 | deflate stream once to generate an index, and then use that index for |
219 | random access. See examples/zran.c . |
220 | |
221 | 29. Does zlib work on MVS, OS/390, CICS, etc.? |
222 | |
223 | It has in the past, but we have not heard of any recent evidence. There |
224 | were working ports of zlib 1.1.4 to MVS, but those links no longer work. |
225 | If you know of recent, successful applications of zlib on these operating |
226 | systems, please let us know. Thanks. |
227 | |
228 | 30. Is there some simpler, easier to read version of inflate I can look at to |
229 | understand the deflate format? |
230 | |
231 | First off, you should read RFC 1951. Second, yes. Look in zlib's |
232 | contrib/puff directory. |
233 | |
234 | 31. Does zlib infringe on any patents? |
235 | |
236 | As far as we know, no. In fact, that was originally the whole point behind |
237 | zlib. Look here for some more information: |
238 | |
239 | http://www.gzip.org/#faq11 |
240 | |
241 | 32. Can zlib work with greater than 4 GB of data? |
242 | |
243 | Yes. inflate() and deflate() will process any amount of data correctly. |
244 | Each call of inflate() or deflate() is limited to input and output chunks |
245 | of the maximum value that can be stored in the compiler's "unsigned int" |
246 | type, but there is no limit to the number of chunks. Note however that the |
247 | strm.total_in and strm_total_out counters may be limited to 4 GB. These |
248 | counters are provided as a convenience and are not used internally by |
249 | inflate() or deflate(). The application can easily set up its own counters |
250 | updated after each call of inflate() or deflate() to count beyond 4 GB. |
251 | compress() and uncompress() may be limited to 4 GB, since they operate in a |
252 | single call. gzseek() and gztell() may be limited to 4 GB depending on how |
253 | zlib is compiled. See the zlibCompileFlags() function in zlib.h. |
254 | |
255 | The word "may" appears several times above since there is a 4 GB limit only |
256 | if the compiler's "long" type is 32 bits. If the compiler's "long" type is |
257 | 64 bits, then the limit is 16 exabytes. |
258 | |
259 | 33. Does zlib have any security vulnerabilities? |
260 | |
261 | The only one that we are aware of is potentially in gzprintf(). If zlib is |
262 | compiled to use sprintf() or vsprintf(), then there is no protection |
263 | against a buffer overflow of an 8K string space (or other value as set by |
264 | gzbuffer()), other than the caller of gzprintf() assuring that the output |
265 | will not exceed 8K. On the other hand, if zlib is compiled to use |
266 | snprintf() or vsnprintf(), which should normally be the case, then there is |
267 | no vulnerability. The ./configure script will display warnings if an |
268 | insecure variation of sprintf() will be used by gzprintf(). Also the |
269 | zlibCompileFlags() function will return information on what variant of |
270 | sprintf() is used by gzprintf(). |
271 | |
272 | If you don't have snprintf() or vsnprintf() and would like one, you can |
273 | find a portable implementation here: |
274 | |
275 | http://www.ijs.si/software/snprintf/ |
276 | |
277 | Note that you should be using the most recent version of zlib. Versions |
278 | 1.1.3 and before were subject to a double-free vulnerability, and versions |
279 | 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 were subject to an access exception when decompressing |
280 | invalid compressed data. |
281 | |
282 | 34. Is there a Java version of zlib? |
283 | |
284 | Probably what you want is to use zlib in Java. zlib is already included |
285 | as part of the Java SDK in the java.util.zip package. If you really want |
286 | a version of zlib written in the Java language, look on the zlib home |
287 | page for links: http://zlib.net/ . |
288 | |
289 | 35. I get this or that compiler or source-code scanner warning when I crank it |
290 | up to maximally-pedantic. Can't you guys write proper code? |
291 | |
292 | Many years ago, we gave up attempting to avoid warnings on every compiler |
293 | in the universe. It just got to be a waste of time, and some compilers |
294 | were downright silly as well as contradicted each other. So now, we simply |
295 | make sure that the code always works. |
296 | |
297 | 36. Valgrind (or some similar memory access checker) says that deflate is |
298 | performing a conditional jump that depends on an uninitialized value. |
299 | Isn't that a bug? |
300 | |
301 | No. That is intentional for performance reasons, and the output of deflate |
302 | is not affected. This only started showing up recently since zlib 1.2.x |
303 | uses malloc() by default for allocations, whereas earlier versions used |
304 | calloc(), which zeros out the allocated memory. Even though the code was |
305 | correct, versions 1.2.4 and later was changed to not stimulate these |
306 | checkers. |
307 | |
308 | 37. Will zlib read the (insert any ancient or arcane format here) compressed |
309 | data format? |
310 | |
311 | Probably not. Look in the comp.compression FAQ for pointers to various |
312 | formats and associated software. |
313 | |
314 | 38. How can I encrypt/decrypt zip files with zlib? |
315 | |
316 | zlib doesn't support encryption. The original PKZIP encryption is very |
317 | weak and can be broken with freely available programs. To get strong |
318 | encryption, use GnuPG, http://www.gnupg.org/ , which already includes zlib |
319 | compression. For PKZIP compatible "encryption", look at |
320 | http://www.info-zip.org/ |
321 | |
322 | 39. What's the difference between the "gzip" and "deflate" HTTP 1.1 encodings? |
323 | |
324 | "gzip" is the gzip format, and "deflate" is the zlib format. They should |
325 | probably have called the second one "zlib" instead to avoid confusion with |
326 | the raw deflate compressed data format. While the HTTP 1.1 RFC 2616 |
327 | correctly points to the zlib specification in RFC 1950 for the "deflate" |
328 | transfer encoding, there have been reports of servers and browsers that |
329 | incorrectly produce or expect raw deflate data per the deflate |
330 | specification in RFC 1951, most notably Microsoft. So even though the |
331 | "deflate" transfer encoding using the zlib format would be the more |
332 | efficient approach (and in fact exactly what the zlib format was designed |
333 | for), using the "gzip" transfer encoding is probably more reliable due to |
334 | an unfortunate choice of name on the part of the HTTP 1.1 authors. |
335 | |
336 | Bottom line: use the gzip format for HTTP 1.1 encoding. |
337 | |
338 | 40. Does zlib support the new "Deflate64" format introduced by PKWare? |
339 | |
340 | No. PKWare has apparently decided to keep that format proprietary, since |
341 | they have not documented it as they have previous compression formats. In |
342 | any case, the compression improvements are so modest compared to other more |
343 | modern approaches, that it's not worth the effort to implement. |
344 | |
345 | 41. I'm having a problem with the zip functions in zlib, can you help? |
346 | |
347 | There are no zip functions in zlib. You are probably using minizip by |
348 | Giles Vollant, which is found in the contrib directory of zlib. It is not |
349 | part of zlib. In fact none of the stuff in contrib is part of zlib. The |
350 | files in there are not supported by the zlib authors. You need to contact |
351 | the authors of the respective contribution for help. |
352 | |
353 | 42. The match.asm code in contrib is under the GNU General Public License. |
354 | Since it's part of zlib, doesn't that mean that all of zlib falls under the |
355 | GNU GPL? |
356 | |
357 | No. The files in contrib are not part of zlib. They were contributed by |
358 | other authors and are provided as a convenience to the user within the zlib |
359 | distribution. Each item in contrib has its own license. |
360 | |
361 | 43. Is zlib subject to export controls? What is its ECCN? |
362 | |
363 | zlib is not subject to export controls, and so is classified as EAR99. |
364 | |
365 | 44. Can you please sign these lengthy legal documents and fax them back to us |
366 | so that we can use your software in our product? |
367 | |
368 | No. Go away. Shoo. |